Which type of monument has a higher priority in boundary descriptions than a call for distance?

In boundary descriptions, natural monuments hold a higher priority than calls for distance due to their permanence and physical reality. Natural monuments typically refer to identifiable features such as trees, rocks, or rivers that can be observed and verified on the ground. These features provide a clear and stable point of reference for boundaries that can endure over time, making them reliable indicators of property lines.

When a boundary description includes both natural monuments and distance, if there is a conflict, the natural monument is favored. This principle stems from the need for clarity and accuracy in land surveying. Artificial monuments, such as fences or signs, are man-made and can be more susceptible to alteration or removal, making them less reliable than natural features. Likewise, courses, which indicate direction, and areas, which describe the extent of land, are secondary in importance when establishing a precise boundary. The rationale behind prioritizing natural monuments is rooted in ensuring that boundary descriptions remain consistent and easily identifiable, reinforcing the integrity of land ownership and property rights.